Reinstatement following layoff focuses on tenure rightsChauvel v. Nyquist, 55 AD2 76, affd., 43 NY2 48)
Does “greater system-wide service” control situationsinvolving layoff of teachers, or is it seniority in corresponding or similarpositions that determines which person is to be offered an open teachingposition first?
Where the performance of duties of the open position isunquestionably “similar” to those of the abolished positions, the teacherhaving the greater seniority in the performance area, not in the employingschool district itself, is to receive the appointment.
Standards for such re-employment are more narrow than thosedealing with layoff (Ward v. Nyquist, 43 NY2d 57) so as to prevent erosion ofthe tenure rights of the incumbents of abolished positions and means that theduties required to be performed in the vacant position must be similar to theduties performed by the person in his previous position before it wasabolished. A test was stated in Elkins, 14 Ed Dept Repts 193, to the effectthat if more than one-half of the functions to be performed by the incumbent ofthe new position are those which he performed in his old position, thepositions are similar.
=========================
=========================
Hiç yorum yok:
Yorum Gönder